Today
in class, instead of having a lecture based off of a chapter in the textbook,
like usual, our discussion was based off of the interesting article from the
New York Times we read last night. One aspect of the article we focused on was
an experiment about the perceptions about mental illness, and how different
perceptions can change how people with mental illnesses are treated. The method
of the experiment was that participants were introduced to someone with a
mental illness (an actor in the study). The actor would either tell the
participant that their mental illness was due to a chemical imbalance in the
brain, or tell them that their mental illness was a result of something that
happened in their childhood. Then the participant would teach the actor to
press some buttons in a certain pattern. If the actor did not press the buttons
in the right order, the participants were told to give the actor a small
electrical shock, which could vary in strength. It was found that if the
participants were told the story about how the mental illness was caused by a
chemical imbalance, they were harsher with the strength of the shocks they
gave. Participants who were told the mental illness was the result of something
that occurred in childhood were more likely to be sympathetic. After discussing
why this was in class, I thought that when someone says it is because of the
chemistry in their brain, it becomes part of them that cannot be separated.
Then it becomes part of their identity, and it is hard to think of them as
separate from their illness. When someone described their mental illness as
being due to something that happened in their childhood, it is as if the cause
of the mental illness was an outside force, and it maybe evoked sympathy from
the participants.
We
also discussed how it is a very Western, American in particular, idea, that
when something goes wrong in someone's life, it is their own responsibility,
and that they should work hard to lift themselves back up. It goes along with
the idea of independence that is very valued in America. In other cultures,
mental illness was thought of in more spiritual terms. In certain cultures,
people with mental illnesses are kept in the social group, and they have
religious rituals they believe will help the ill person's spirit. The
discussion was very interesting, and I participated a lot in the discussion.
I surprised myself in this course by talking a
lot in class, because normally in academic situations I am not very verbal. I
think because the class was so small, it was easier to speak in front of
everyone. Also, I didn't know these people before these three weeks, so it was
easy not to worry about what they would think of what I had to say. After this
long discussion, Amanda the TA, did a short lecture on the importance of being
objective in observations rather than subjective. For example, we cannot say in
our notes, "The boy was happy." Instead we have to write, "The
boy was laughing and smiling." We can never assume about one's emotions
because you cannot get into somebodies mind and know their emotions. You can
only see their actions and hear their words. We did a couple of exercises with
this, practicing changes notes from subjective to objective.
A few minutes later, we were excused for
lunch. I went to the Grounds of Being cafe again. I got a tandoori chicken
sandwich and cucumber sparkling water. On my lunch break, I went to the
bookstore to buy some postcards to write to friends back home. Back in class,
we were taught how to write the very first thing in a psychology paper, the
abstract. It is basically an overview of the whole paper, but very summarized.
It is only supposed to be about 250 words. I finished that in class and then
went on making corrections on the rest of my paper. We were told that on the
last day of class, we had to make a twenty minute power point presentation with
our group. Tomorrow we will work on that. We were dismissed from class at 2:30.
I went back to the dorms for a bit to work on my paper. After a about an hour
and a half I went to the gym for an hour and a half as well. I walked back to
dinner, where I ate with Dani and April, her project partner. Later Oyin joined
us. She had just arrived back on campus because she had a field trip and there
was traffic on the way back from the city. I went to my room to finish my
homework and blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment